<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><copyright>Copyright 2026, PC SOFT</copyright><lastBuildDate>6 Dec 2018 16:59:02 Z</lastBuildDate><pubDate>22 Jul 2016 11:46:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi,&#13;
&#13;
I have a stopwatch in my application before I call HEXECUTEQUERY() and after Tabledisplay() I stop the watch.&#13;
&#13;
I found a funny behaviour (local or over the internet, different databases, all the same)&#13;
&#13;
The first call is quit fast (1-2 seconds), the next calls taken 5-6 seconds.&#13;
Whats the reason ?&#13;
&#13;
IMHO HF SQL should be faster after the first call (cache).&#13;
&#13;
Any ideas ?&#13;
--------------------------------------&#13;
&#13;
Mmh, it looks like that the Problem is "tabledisplay". It tooks 5 times longer after the first call.</description><ttl>30</ttl><generator>WEBDEV</generator><language>en_US</language><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp</link><title>[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title><managingEditor>moderateur@pcsoft.fr (El moderador)</managingEditor><webMaster>webmaster@pcsoft.fr (El webmaster)</webMaster><item><author>Joris_Martens</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-66919/read.awp</comments><pubDate>6 Dec 2018 16:59:02 Z</pubDate><description>Hi, &#13;
&#13;
Today I have noticed the same problem in a WD23 project using HFSQL client/server version 23.&#13;
The first time i run the …</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-66919/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-66919/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58867/read.awp</comments><pubDate>27 Jul 2016 08:31:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Derek,&#13;
&#13;
I use the AAF Tablesort in the header of the table. Every user understand, how to use it :-)</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58867/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58867/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58862/read.awp</comments><pubDate>26 Jul 2016 21:44:00 Z</pubDate><description>Quote&#13;
Michael Drechsel&#13;
&#13;
Hir Derek,&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
ok, but what´s the difference between "your" memory solution and "PC Softs loaded i…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58862/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58862/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58858/read.awp</comments><pubDate>26 Jul 2016 14:54:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hir Derek,&#13;
&#13;
ok, but what´s the difference between "your" memory solution and "PC Softs loaded in memory" ?&#13;
It´s both memory .…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58858/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58858/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58855/read.awp</comments><pubDate>26 Jul 2016 14:46:00 Z</pubDate><description>Michael&#13;
&#13;
Hows about defining a array based on a structure and bind the table to the array&#13;
&#13;
hexecutequery(QryNoname1)&#13;
FileTo…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58855/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58855/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58853/read.awp</comments><pubDate>26 Jul 2016 13:59:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Jose,&#13;
&#13;
I defined a special sort option ("ignorecase") for all my string fields, maybe this is the reason.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58853/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58853/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58852/read.awp</comments><pubDate>26 Jul 2016 13:35:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Michael.&#13;
So as you said the this behavior happens also on local database hfclassic, so i did a test:&#13;
&#13;
I have a query of ab…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58852/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58852/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58838/read.awp</comments><pubDate>25 Jul 2016 20:21:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Fabrice,&#13;
&#13;
nope.&#13;
&#13;
If I don´t use Mytable..BrowsedFile="" the whole process takes 5 secondes, with that only 1-2 seconds.&#13;
…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58838/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58838/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58837/read.awp</comments><pubDate>25 Jul 2016 19:40:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Michael,&#13;
&#13;
I wonder if you measured the time needed for the Mytable..BrowsedFile="". This SHOULD be equal to your time diffe…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58837/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58837/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-solved-58814/read.awp</comments><pubDate>23 Jul 2016 08:37:00 Z</pubDate><description>Ok, here a solution:&#13;
&#13;
Put a&#13;
&#13;
Mytable..BrowsedFile=""&#13;
&#13;
before the "HEXECUTEQRY"&#13;
&#13;
and then a&#13;
&#13;
Mytable..BrowsedFile=MyQue…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-solved-58814/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-solved-58814/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server [SOLVED[</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58815/read.awp</comments><pubDate>23 Jul 2016 08:07:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Stefan,&#13;
&#13;
yes, it makes no difference.&#13;
&#13;
The table has ~6.500 rows.&#13;
&#13;
It looks like that tabledisplay (delete+fill) take s…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58815/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58815/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58812/read.awp</comments><pubDate>23 Jul 2016 06:09:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hmmmmm,&#13;
&#13;
I have also observed this behavior that is after first call to TableDisplay the consecutive calls to TableDispaly see…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58812/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58812/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58809/read.awp</comments><pubDate>22 Jul 2016 17:24:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Michael,&#13;
&#13;
do you use MyTable..DisplayEnabled = False before and MyTable..DisplayEnabled = True after TableDisplay()?</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58809/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server-58809/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/58805-wd2x-performance-sql-server/read.awp">[WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</source><title>Re: [WD2X] Performance of HF SQL Server</title></item></channel></rss>
