<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><copyright>Copyright 2026, PC SOFT</copyright><lastBuildDate>4 Dec 2017 18:28:00 Z</lastBuildDate><pubDate>4 Dec 2017 13:36:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hello all -&#13;
&#13;
Previous user of WB16. I ended up hating it. Nothing quite worked as claimed. I abandoned it.&#13;
&#13;
I still have a soft spot for the Wx family. I love WinDev but the reality is that Windows is rapidly becoming a legacy platform. I still appreciate the simplicity offered by WX however and am wondering if WB is now ready for prime time.&#13;
&#13;
Question 1:&#13;
&#13;
Specifically, if I look at a typically web development workflow, I have a UI/UX designer creating nice HTML with JS. Then, the developers add the actual code and backend logic.&#13;
&#13;
Or, I can buy a commercial theme (for example http://keenthemes.com/preview/metronic/)&#13;
&#13;
So my question. Can WB22 properly use an existing html theme/template/code, respecting the CSS and JS in the theme, so that I can go in and work on the code? Or am I going to be stuck dealing with PCSoft's proprietary stuff?&#13;
&#13;
Question 2:&#13;
&#13;
I see they're still using the proprietary app server :( Anyone deploying production apps using PHP generation?&#13;
&#13;
Would love to get your input before I spend the $ on this again. Also, if anybody has successfully used a commercial theme let me know.</description><ttl>30</ttl><generator>WEBDEV</generator><language>en_US</language><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back/read.awp</link><title>WebDev 22 - Time to come back?</title><managingEditor>moderateur@pcsoft.fr (El moderador)</managingEditor><webMaster>webmaster@pcsoft.fr (El webmaster)</webMaster><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back-63560/read.awp</comments><pubDate>4 Dec 2017 18:28:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hey Fabrice - thanks for the info.&#13;
&#13;
Disappointed re Q1 but good to know now before buying it :) Maybe by WB45 they'll comply w…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back-63560/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back-63560/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back/read.awp">WebDev 22 - Time to come back?</source><title>Re: WebDev 22 - Time to come back?</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back-63558/read.awp</comments><pubDate>4 Dec 2017 14:05:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hello Chris,&#13;
&#13;
Q1 : no, you cannot use easily existing html/templates... And yes, you will have to use webdev if you want to us…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back-63558/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back-63558/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/es-ES/pcsoft.us.windev/63557-webdev-22-time-come-back/read.awp">WebDev 22 - Time to come back?</source><title>Re: WebDev 22 - Time to come back?</title></item></channel></rss>
