<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><copyright>Copyright 2026, PC SOFT</copyright><lastBuildDate>16 Feb 2014 20:23:00 Z</lastBuildDate><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 09:23:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi,&#13;
&#13;
I readed this http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3040413/windev-user-standpoi&#13;
&#13;
&#13;
The point is, some years ago when I used windev for first ime, I had the same feeling, all just marketing mainly. With webdev and mobile nearly unusable,support inexistent, just new versions with nearly "1000" new features every year.&#13;
&#13;
Some years later something changed?&#13;
&#13;
I see still without exists LST on other language than French. And all about marketing and sexy girls. Still seeing a lot of bugs don't resolved since some versions, no new success stories (are porche, playmobil, jhon Deere and so on still using windev? )&#13;
&#13;
I ask mainly because we are thinking to come back to windev, and don't want to do a bad decission,because want to focus our web desktop and mobile new projects on PCSoft suite.&#13;
&#13;
I know this is not maybe the more objetive place to ask.&#13;
&#13;
Regards.</description><ttl>30</ttl><generator>WEBDEV</generator><language>en_US</language><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp</link><title>Polemic criticism about windev</title><managingEditor>moderateur@pcsoft.fr (O moderador)</managingEditor><webMaster>webmaster@pcsoft.fr (O webmaster)</webMaster><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44593/read.awp</comments><pubDate>16 Feb 2014 20:23:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi all&#13;
&#13;
Just one of the facts (amoung many, many others) I decided to take the risk and develop in WD all of the software that…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44593/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44593/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44575/read.awp</comments><pubDate>14 Feb 2014 18:03:00 Z</pubDate><description>hi GiuDev&#13;
If new versions with nearly "1000" new features every year, without exists LST on other language than French and some…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44575/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44575/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44546/read.awp</comments><pubDate>14 Feb 2014 08:12:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Luiz,&#13;
&#13;
congratulations! Once more this one shows the difference between the two main groups of programmers, which basically…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44546/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44546/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44541/read.awp</comments><pubDate>14 Feb 2014 01:50:00 Z</pubDate><description>I'd like to say that this morning I had a call from a Customer and at the end of the day a Rich, Useful and Complete Application…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44541/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44541/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44532/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 16:42:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Fabrice,&#13;
&#13;
Maybe I don't explained correctly. I'm not at all who is criticing Windev suite. As I mentioned, I worked in the …</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44532/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44532/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44528/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 15:49:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi GiuDev&#13;
&#13;
it seems to me that if you start like that, there is absolutely NO POINT in you buying a license from PCSoft... Dur…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44528/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44528/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44527/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 15:45:00 Z</pubDate><description>@Viggo ;)&#13;
&#13;
On the serious side, I also have .NET - but when you are spoiled on WinDev`s feature rich gui like me, I find it ha…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44527/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44527/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44526/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 15:02:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi Tor-Bjarne&#13;
&#13;
Once again Norway and Denmark are very much alike :-)&#13;
&#13;
Best regards&#13;
Viggo Poulsen&#13;
Denmark</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44526/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44526/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44525/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 15:01:00 Z</pubDate><description>Quote&#13;
Arie Mars&#13;
&#13;
Hi,&#13;
&#13;
you have to be more specific, I think.&#13;
&#13;
If your question is " can I use pcsoft products to develop …</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44525/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44525/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44524/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 14:53:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi GiuDev,&#13;
&#13;
I would never had purchased WinDev it they not had the sexy girls in their brochure, I did not care what problems …</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44524/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44524/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>tbc92</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44521/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 14:43:56 Z</pubDate><description>Hi&#13;
&#13;
The good tool is the tool that you choose and that you like.&#13;
It is totally subjective.&#13;
&#13;
My opinion is that Wxxdev is ve…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44521/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44521/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44513/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 10:42:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi,&#13;
you have to be more specific, I think.&#13;
If your question is " can I use pcsoft products to develop websites and app" then t…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44513/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44513/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44511/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 10:15:00 Z</pubDate><description>Hi GiuDev&#13;
&#13;
I have used Windev Mobile ande Webdev (and a little Windev) for a little over 1 year now. Before this it was Clario…</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44511/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44511/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item><item><author>guest</author><category>pcsoft.us.windev</category><comments>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44509/read.awp</comments><pubDate>13 Feb 2014 09:56:00 Z</pubDate><description>Well I feel for you. See my comments elsewhere in this forum.&#13;
click here.</description><guid isPermaLink="true">https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44509/read.awp</guid><link>https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev-44509/read.awp</link><source url="https://forum.pcsoft.fr/pt-BR/pcsoft.us.windev/44507-polemic-criticism-about-windev/read.awp">Polemic criticism about windev</source><title>Re: Polemic criticism about windev</title></item></channel></rss>
